Tuesday, June 9, 2026
As I continue my cinematic journey through France in preparation for my summer trip, I recently revisited Last Tango in Paris (1972) with a friend.
After the film ended, we agreed on one thing: it is not an easy watch.
Where we differed was in what we took away from it.
My friend felt the film had not aged well. Given what we now know about its production, and the way many of its sexual and power dynamics are viewed today, I understand that perspective.
Yet watching it through my Mortality Movies lens, I was struck by something else. Beneath the controversy lies a powerful and unsettling portrait of grief. At its core, Last Tango in Paris is not really about sex. It is about what happens when grief is denied a voice, a witness, and a place to go.
The story follows Paul, a middle-aged American living in Paris who is reeling from the recent suicide of his wife, Rose. Rather than mourn openly, he enters an anonymous sexual relationship with a much younger woman, Jeanne. He insists they share no names, no personal histories, and no emotional attachments.
One of the most revealing scenes occurs when Paul establishes this strange rule.
No Names. No History.
At first, Paul’s demand seems designed to create freedom.
No past. No obligations. No expectations.
But viewed through the lens of grief, it becomes something else entirely.
Paul is trying to escape his own story.
If Jeanne doesn’t know who he is, she can’t ask about Rose. She can’t touch the wound left by suicide. She can’t force him to confront the reality he is desperately trying to avoid.
The relationship becomes a hiding place rather than a connection.
Yet grief has a way of finding us no matter how many barriers we build around it. The harder Paul tries to keep his history outside the room, the more it dominates every aspect of his life.
His anonymity isn’t liberation.
It’s avoidance.
The Hidden Labor After Death
Another scene that stayed with me involves a young hotel employee cleaning the bathroom where Rose died.
It is not a dramatic scene. There are no speeches or emotional confrontations.
Instead, we witness something films rarely show.
Someone has to clean up.
Death is not only emotional and philosophical. It is also physical, practical, and messy.
As someone who has spent years encouraging conversations about death and dying, I was struck by how this brief scene acknowledges the people who often remain invisible after a death occurs.
When someone dies, especially by suicide, the impact extends far beyond immediate family members. Friends, coworkers, first responders, funeral professionals, and sometimes complete strangers become part of the aftermath.
The scene reminds us that grief leaves traces in places we don’t always think to look.
When Mourning Has No Structure
Perhaps the most significant mortality scene comes when Paul speaks with Rose’s mother about funeral arrangements.
He insists there be no funeral Mass, no priests, arguing that the Church doesn’t approve of suicides.
Historically, many religious traditions treated suicide differently from other deaths, sometimes denying funeral rites or adding layers of stigma for surviving family members.
What makes the scene powerful is that Paul’s response is not theological.
It is emotional.
He is angry.
He is protective.
He is grieving.
Beneath the conversation lies a larger question: What happens when mourners feel excluded from the very rituals that are supposed to help them heal?
Throughout the film, Paul appears to have no meaningful structure for his grief. No trusted community. No therapeutic support. No healthy ritual through which to process his loss.
The result is a grief that spills into every corner of his life.
A Film That Hasn’t Aged Comfortably
My friend’s criticism deserves consideration.
Many viewers today find aspects of Last Tango in Paris troubling, both because of what appears on screen and because of what later emerged about the film’s production. In later years, actress Maria Schneider, age 19 at the time of filming, described feeling exploited during the making of the film. There were also comments by director Bernardo Bertolucci that fueled ongoing debates about consent, power, and artistic responsibility. For many modern viewers, these concerns are impossible to separate from the viewing experience and have become part of the film’s legacy.
I don’t think we need to ignore those concerns in order to acknowledge the film’s exploration of grief.
In fact, holding both truths may be the most honest response.
A film can be artistically significant and deeply problematic.
It can offer insight while also making us uncomfortable.
It can reveal emotional truths while reflecting attitudes that deserve criticism.
Grief Will Be Heard
Unlike many films about loss, Last Tango in Paris offers no redemption arc.
Paul never finds peace.
He never develops healthy ways to mourn.
He never learns how to carry his grief without being consumed by it.
That may be why the film remains so disturbing.
It presents grief not as a pathway toward healing but as a force that, when denied acknowledgment and structure, can become destructive.
One week earlier, I revisited Chocolat, another French film that explores the influence of the dead on the living. In that story, Vianne eventually learns how to honor her mother’s memory without allowing it to control her life.
Paul never reaches that point.
His grief remains unspoken, unsupported, and unresolved.
Last Tango in Paris may not be a comforting film, and it certainly isn’t a simple one. But viewed through a mortality lens, it serves as a stark reminder that grief does not disappear when ignored.
It finds another way to speak.
And if we refuse to listen, it may eventually consume everything in its path.
Mortality Movie Question: Have you ever seen grief expressed through anger, avoidance, or self-destructive behavior rather than sadness? How did it affect the people around the grieving person?
Gail Rubin, Certified Thanatologist, features Last Tango in Paris in the “Grief and Growth” chapter of her latest book, 98.6 Mortality Movies to See Before You Die.
Related
Gail Rubin, CT, is author and host of the award-winning book and television series, A Good Goodbye: Funeral Planning for Those Who Don’t Plan to Die, Hail and Farewell: Cremation Ceremonies, Templates and Tips, KICKING THE BUCKET LIST: 100 Downsizing and Organizing Things to Do Before You Die and The Before I Die Festival in a Box™.
Rubin is a Certified Thanatologist (that's a death educator) and a popular speaker who uses humor and films to get the end-of-life and funeral planning conversation started. She "knocked 'em dead" with her TEDx talk, A Good Goodbye. She provides continuing education credit classes for attorneys, doctors, nurses, social workers, hospice workers, financial planners, funeral directors and other professionals. She's a Certified Funeral Celebrant and funeral planning consultant who has been interviewed in national and local print, broadcast and online media.
Known as The Doyenne of Death®, she is the event coordinator of the Before I Die New Mexico Festival and author of a guide to holding such festivals. Her podcast is also called The Doyenne of Death®. She produces videos about the funeral business and related topics. Her YouTube Channel features hundreds of videos!
Rubin is a member of the Association for Death Education and Counseling, the International Cemetery, Cremation and Funeral Association, Toastmasters International and the National Speakers Association. Her speaking profile is available at eSpeakers.com.
Gail Rubin has been interviewed about funeral planning issues in national and local broadcast, print and online media. Outlets include The Huffington Post, Money Magazine, Kiplinger, CBS Radio News, WGN-TV, and local affiliates for NPR, PBS, FOX, ABC-TV, CBS-TV and NBC-TV. Albuquerque Business First named her as one of their 2019 Women of Influence.
Sign up for a free planning form and occasional informative newsletter at her website, AGoodGoodbye.com.