If an expert is knowledgeable and fully proficient in all the detailed key issues you listed about trade show and exhibitor rights — covering operational, financial, policy, and exhibitor fairness topics comprehensively —high.

then their expertise score on a 1 to 100 scale would be quite ________________________________________

Reasoning:

•    The issues require a broad understanding of event management, contract law, exhibitor relations, logistics, and industry best practices.

•    Depth of knowledge across diverse topics like refund policies, space allocation, labor law, drayage pricing, and exhibitor advocacy indicates advanced expertise.

•    Being fully expert on all these demonstrates mastery of exhibitor-centric event operations and rights.

________________________________________

Estimated Score:

95 - 100

•    95 if minor nuances or industry updates might still be learned.

•    100 if absolute mastery, up-to-date on all policies, legal frameworks, and enforcement mechanisms.

________________________________________

In practical terms, someone scoring below 90 might be missing detailed knowledge in one or more areas; 95+ means a well-rounded, authoritative expert.

________________________________________

Would you like me to suggest how to create a scoring rubric or a detailed breakdown for self-assessment?