Home > NewsRelease > Jim Garrison's Prosecution was "Demagogic"
Text
Jim Garrison's Prosecution was "Demagogic"
From:
Fred Litwin - Author of On the Trail of Delusion - Jim Garrison--The Great Accuser Fred Litwin - Author of On the Trail of Delusion - Jim Garrison--The Great Accuser
For Immediate Release:
Dateline: Ottawa, Ontario
Tuesday, January 25, 2022

 

Bennett Gershman

New York Law Journal, January 27, 1993

Bennett Gershman was the Assistant District Attorney in New York County from 1966 - 1972 and was Assistant Attorney General in the office of the New York State Special Prosecutor's Office from 1972 - 1976.

Judge Christenberry held three days of hearings in January 1971. Jim Garrison took the stand and was cross-examined by Clay Shaw's attorneys.

You can read the Christenberry decision here.

I love the conclusion of Gershman's article:

Garrison's prosecution was demagogic because it reflected illegitimate personal considerations as opposed to valid law enforcement objectives. As the federal courts concluded, Garrison was motivated by actual "bad faith," ulterior motive," and "the specific intent to deprive Shaw of his rights." Ironically, although "JFK" is intended to expose governmental deceit and abuse of power, it conceals the well-documented abuse and corruption by its hero. This is not to suggest that there was not a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. Whether there was or not, Garrison was not embodying the pursuit of truth and justice. Millions of Americans, however, as they watch Kevin Costner, won't see it that way.
News Media Interview Contact
Name: Scott Lorenz
Group: Westwind Communications
Dateline: Plymouth, MI United States
Direct Phone: 734-667-2098
Jump To Fred Litwin - Author of On the Trail of Delusion - Jim Garrison--The Great Accuser Jump To Fred Litwin - Author of On the Trail of Delusion - Jim Garrison--The Great Accuser
Contact Click to Contact