Home > NewsRelease > On behalf of the Earth and all Plant and Animal Life, we demand an open discussion of the Geoengineering Projects
Text Graphics
On behalf of the Earth and all Plant and Animal Life, we demand an open discussion of the Geoengineering Projects
From:
Dr. Hans J. Kugler, PhD --  Anti-Aging Medicine Expert Dr. Hans J. Kugler, PhD -- Anti-Aging Medicine Expert
Los Angeles , CA
Monday, September 22, 2014


Dr. Hans J. Kugler, PhD
 

On behalf of the Earth and all Plant and Animal Life, we demand an open discussion among informed, and genuine Climate Change, scientists, about the Geoengineering projects that are altering the sustainability of life on this planet.

Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will! Frederick Douglas

Supporting/endorsing the demand:

IAAM - International Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine

NHF - National Health Federation

Geoengineeringwatch.org

A4M American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine

More specific: On behalf of the Earth and all Plant and Animal Life, IAAM (International Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine), and supporting organizations, demand an open discussion among independent, and genuine Climate Change, scientists - - un-associated with special energy interests like oil, coal, fracking - - about the Geoengineering projects - Solar Radiation Management (SRM), Weather Modification, Chemtrails - that are altering the sustainability of life on this planet, while ignoring our – US – energy projects that CAN/COULD solve all our energy needs with Water and solar – PV – electricity; see 20) for specifics.

GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL; so real that the carbon industry has spent $ 543 million over the past years to plant BOGUS arguments, and blow smoke up your YOU KNOW WHAT to confuse the issues, and prevent you from thinking NON-CARBON US CLEAN ENERGY PROJECTS.  http://drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change.

For each point of the below find more detailed explanations, science facts, and documentation at  http://www.worldhealth.net/forum/thread/100199/srm-geoengineering-chemtrails-effecti/?page=1#post-100199 .

1) With the Arctic Methane Emergency Group warning of a Methane-caused Planetary Emergency - - disappearing Arctic sea ice causing melting of permafrost areas (Tundra), releasing enormous amounts of Methane (presently 50 million tons/year) into the atmosphere - - hushed up by the media, and apparently nobody doing anything about it, we inquired and learned that: What was suspected over past years, under the name of "Geoengineering," "Chemtrails", "climate modification", SRM (Solar Radiation Management) a global spraying project (airplanes spraying megatons of Aluminum, Barium, Strontium, others, into high layers of the atmosphere to block some sun energy from reaching earth) has been going on worldwide for a number of years now (1995 and later).

AMEG announcement: http://arcticclimateemergency.com/#/emergency/4558130739 Nobel Laureate prof. Kirk Smith, Berkeley: Methane: Carbon on Steroids: http://bit.ly/1oAO80l  Also: http://www.expertclick.com/NRWire/Releasedetails.aspx?id=58466

2) DEFINING THE BASIC PROBLEM – excess CO2 production.

Over hundreds of thousands of years - - despite uncontrolled fires, cold spells, volcanic eruptions, other - - CO2 levels have spiked frequently, but nature always averaged them out to about 300 ppm, or less. Starting around 1900, with the industrial and population explosion, CO2 levels started to increase steadily. Scientists calculated a level of 350 ppm as maximum acceptable, but dreaded anything above that, especially a level of 400 ppm, throwing climate, eco-balance, into worldwide disarray.

Source: NASA : view graph at  http://www.DrHansKugler.com 

This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct  measurements, provides evidence that atmospheric CO2 has increased  since the Industrial Revolution.  (Source: [[LINK| <a href=http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/||NOAA]])" src="file:///C:\Users\DRKUGL~1\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image002.jpg" style="height:256px; width:485px" />

 

Earth's first line of defenses against CO2 are the big balancers, trees and oceans, that take in CO2, and give off O2, oxygen. With CO2 levels climbing to 350 ppm, trees start to shut down CO2 up-take (because CO2 becomes toxic to them at these levels), ocean acidification started to terminate life in the aqueous hemisphere, and earth followed a rapid downhill spiral. Studies at universities confirmed, again and again that, at the present CO2 levels, trees and oceans are only able to balance 54% of all CO2 produced, leaving us, in the US alone, with a daily EXCESS of around 16 billion pounds of CO2 PER DAY. In October of 2013, measuring station started to report CO2 levels of 400 ppm.  http://www.climatecentral.org/news/co2-milestone-400-ppm-climate-17692

3) Planetary Suicide; suddenly trees are dying worldwide; estimates by forestry experts suggest that, within 10 – 15 years, at least half of all trees will be dead. Trees dying is due to two factors: 1) Destructive tree beetles; due to temperatures raised by GW (Global Warming), tree beetles now replicate twice as fast, and 2) Aluminum poisoning, which makes trees shut down water up-take (the source of toxic aluminum), which weakens trees and makes them even more susceptible to beetle attacks. Both could be brought back to homeostasis by focusing on the cause of Global Warming, excess CO2, and terminating Geoengineering. Allowing the tree die-off to continue is plain suicide.

References: For "Aluminum toxic to trees", from Pub-med –NIH – data-search: https://chemtrailsinourskies.wordpress.com/category/our-dead-and-dying-trees  Also: http://aircrap.org/our-dead-and-dying-trees/331032 . Also David B. Lindenmayer, William F. Laurance, and Jerry F. Franklin. Global Decline in Large Old Trees. Science, 2012; 338 (6112): 1305-1306 DOI: 10.1126/science.1231070 .

Aluminum toxicity and forest decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun 1988; 85(11): 3888–3892. PMCID: PMC280325, D. L. Godbold,* E. Fritz, and A. Hüttermann. http://treephys.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/3/337.full.pdf  

4) METHANE: As a greenhouse gas, Methane – CH4 – is 105 times more potent than CO2. 400 to 1,000 gigatons - - about 3 times the total of all oil, coal, and gas deposits on earth - - previously safely tugged away in tundra permafrost land, and in cold oceans (as "clathrates"), due to the rapidly disappearing Arctic ice causing permafrost areas to thaw, and oceans to warm, it is now putting 50 million tons of Methane into the atmosphere each year, AND INCREASING RAPIDLY! Only 1 – ONE – percent of these Methane deposits, released into the atmosphere, is enough to cause an irreversible "NO RETURN" catastrophe.

Watch "Methane: why the Sea Ice matters" at  http://www.ameg.me , and you will see some of our greatest minds, true GW experts - - Prof. Peter Wadhams, Cambridge U Arctic expert, Dr. James Hansen, NASA, John Nissen, AMEG chairman, David Wasdell, director Apollo Gaia project, Dr. Natalia Shakhova, U. Farbanks, Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr. Richard Milne, U. of Edinburgh - - confirming/explaining these facts in the quoted URLs.

How serious is the Methane risk? If we don't stop Arctic sea ice losses, and allow the Methane problem to worsen: Cost: NATURE, 499, 2013: $ 60  Trillion.  Also: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/arctic-death-spiral-and-the-methane-time-bom .

Now back to the self-destructing Voo Doo of Geoengineering, Chemtrails, SRM:

First time one – myself, former oil industry research chemist and professor of chemistry, other scientists questioned - learns about Chemtrails, weather modification, the response is laughter and rejection of such "conspiracy idiocy"; thinking about possible scientific reasoning behind such a project, one concludes: "Who would do such a stupid thing (?) - - not even government could think up such a retarded, brainless Frankenstein scheme."

5) And then - MOSCOW, Russia – Edward Snowden came forward and confirmed "Chemtrails" as classified project(s). The shocking truth, as he says, is that government agents have carefully kept the massive Chemtrail efforts completely under wraps, and that it was NOT initiated and OK'd by a consensus of Climate Change scientists (- who? If not ippc scientists? Self-appointed oil, coal, fracking, Monsanto,"experts"?) http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-uncovers-shocking-truth-behind-chemtrails

6) As justification for Chemtrails - they apparently used a 1992 National Academy of Sciences report (Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine), pointing out that Global Warming would affect billions of people world-wide, and that – besides eliminating coal and oil - very little could be done about it.

7) Then, 2003 - 04, an anonymous "deep throat" Geoengineering insider - "Deep Shield" who, from his statements and knowledge of science facts, must have been a higher-up scientist – also confirmed and exposed it all. A few days later he was found dead! "Suicide!" How convenient! http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/shieldproject.html

8) Just a few of the many things "Deep Shield" confirmed: "I can only draw one conclusion that the threat of UV summer and major climatic, global warming is worth the risk of poisoning 30% of the earth, humanity and otherwise."

The Shield's primary mission was to repair ozone, reflect UV and Infrared radiation back out into space, and mitigate the green house effect. They acknowledged that "over the next 50 years there will be 2 billion causalities" (an estimate which, according to our – IAAM – and true GW expert data, was FAR too low), and that (2004) "the Shield Project was basically worthless when it came to reducing these issues."

9) 2004 – 2006 spraying was enhanced; now observable worldwide. Re-evaluations of carbon-free energy projects that were being discovered had not been done; had it been done, it would have shown that the 10-billion+ dollar/year price tag of Geoengineering was not only wasted, risked peoples' health, killed our first line of defense against excess CO2, trees and oceans, but would have been better invested in clean energy projects. Looking at the bottom-line, this was another strong hint that the carbon industry was really pulling the strings.

10) 2012 and years following: weather had worsened, and the shield actions had not only failed, but actually WORSENED THE PROBLEM. http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/26696.html . UV radiation getting worse ("it burns the bark off trees"), and key Global Warming facts - - Arctic sea ice disappearing at a much faster rate than calculated previously - - support the suggestion that Geoengineering had actually worsened the situation. With basic laws of physics disagreeing – energy accountability, and laws of thermodynamics – and showing that there was no logic in the Geoengineering approach, one wonders about the "experts" that justified such pseudo-scientific VooDoo": what was more dominant: their lack of knowledge of basic science facts, or their – special (oil, coal, fracking)-interest-influence, trying to delay real actions while maintaining carbon industry profits?

11) With these toxic chemicals established as causative modalities in Alzheimers, inflammation, immune dysfunction, and possibly cancer – supported by great increases in specific diseases (Autism, severe inflammation, a starting point for literally any immune-connected disease) over the past years – should spraying the toxic chemicals now be classified as a criminal act against the people? "Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease:" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056430

12) We contacted true climate change scientists – from MIT, to Harvard, Stony Brook, RMI, and Berkeley – but nobody confirmed that they were involved with, or had been asked their opinion, about the Geoengineering projects.

13) So, why – truthfully, please – continue this money-wasting, everything-failing, Frankenstein pseudo-science of Geoengineering? Top Climate Change scientists presented numerous research studies that proved, without a question of a doubt, that such short-cuts only worsen the overall picture. To learn more about the devastating effects of these people-, land-, and environment-insulting actions, please look at the facts presented at: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org .

14) Unless you look at it as "Population Control" (makes no sense; no amount of money could protect anybody against the toxic effects of spraying), or from an oil/coal/gas position that refuses to accept its responsibility as causative factor of Global Warming – excess CO2 production - and will do ANYTHING, from lying to planting BOGUS arguments(*), to maintain carbon profits, there is no logical reason to continue the spraying. Yet, they are doing it – almost in a hysterical last-ditch attempt to prove some kind of effectiveness – while real science is demonstrating that, to reverse Global Warming, we must take a totally different path for which, on a more positive note, we now have the - already proven -  technologies; for details see 20). (*)http://drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change

15) Numerous scientific studies confirmed CO2 AS THE CAUSATIVE FACTOR OF GW; the excess CO2 is so large that it is FAR outside any range of error. If in doubt, start with the explanations by prof. David Wasdell, Apollo Gaia Project, in "Why the Arctic Ice matters" at   http://www.ameg.me . See also "NUTS! to the GW Denialists!" at http://www.DrHansKugler.com .

16) With the risk of Alzheimers caused by toxic Aluminum an established fact, how does Monsanto, with its engineered aluminum-resistant crops fit into this picture? http://www.worldhealth.net/forum/thread/100130/chemtrail-spraying-mega-tons-of-aluminum/?page=1#post-100130 .

17) The problem with Government is that, once it initiates a program, or implements a law, it is extremely difficult to reverse. At the time when, based on the National Academy of Sciences report, they, pessimistically, concluded "I can only draw one conclusion that the threat of UV summer and major climatic, global warming is worth the risk of poisoning 30% of the earth, humanity and otherwise," things looked truly bad. However, with today's knowledge of what really causes Global Warming – excess CO2 - , and amazing discoveries at our leading universities things look much more optimistic; WE CERTAINLY HAVE THE CAPACITY TO REVERSE GLOBAL WARMING. The question is just how to bring this message of extreme urgency past the carbon barrier to clearly thinking heads in Governments (- if there are any, un-infected by blinding carbon $$?), and how fast we can get true action started?

So, what needs to be done? Prof. Dan Nocera: "Shift happens."

18) THE SCIENCE IS CLEAR; IT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF: Excess CO2, without any question of a doubt, is THE # 1 cause of Global Warming: CO2, a heat-trapping gas, begins warming, causes temperature increases in tundra - - increased temperature drives water vapor feedback, water vapor feedback accelerates heating, which initiates more heating, etc., etc.

Because the extreme CO2 amounts created by burning fossil fuels – more than twice the amounts plants and oceans can handle, and GREATLY enhanced by Geoengineering spraying -  CO2 is the # 1 trigger/cause of Global Warming, ocean acidification, death of sea life, shifting ecosystem balance, species extinction, and much more. Therefore the logical thing must be to reduce CO2 by 80%, not by 2050, but by 2020, preferentially earlier. Emphasizing conservation (30% reduction in CO2 and energy savings), and quickly shifting from coal to NON-CARBON SOURCES OF ENERGY (- which has already started in California, Washington, Oregon -) must be the initial main thrust. SHORT-CUTS AND GIMMICKS – like Chemtrails, geoengineering, that don't address the # 1 cause of Global Warming – excess CO2 -, are MAJOR disease risks, kill trees, and in reality appear just aimed at extending usage of carbon-based fuels - DON'T WORK, and must be scrapped immediately.

DON'T LET THE COAL, OIL, AND FRACKING INDUSTRY, WITH THEIR PLANTED BOGUS ARGUMENTS, PULL THE WOOL OVER YOUR EYES. http://drexel.edu/now/news-media/releases/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change .

19) THIS IS THE CHALLENGE OF OUR LIFETIME, our last chance to – worldwide – work together, and save planet earth. When geoengineering – weather modification – was authorized, governments decided to keep it secret; they thought it best not to upset the public, to prevent mass hysteria. Obviously, in retrospect, this was wrong. People believed that things were under control, energy waste continued, and car companies failed in producing pollution-free vehicles; a typical example was GM's 1996 EV-1, praised as an automotive miracle, an electric hybrid that could be driven gasoline-free, and that was – under the influence of the oil industry - recalled and scrapped. Check out - an absolute MUST: "Who Killed the Electric Car?" - - "the automotive blunder in history:" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489037 .

This schlocky, non-thinking, approach spread like a disease, leading to (news items Aug. 2014) utility companies sponsoring laws to make it difficult for people to install solar, and homeowners who had installed solar rooftops are waiting for months to get meters installed and activated.  OUTRIGHT IRRESPONSIBLE!

20) This environmental emergency is as real as it can get. http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/26696.html Governments need to bring this message to their people with a Doomsday warning issued by governments globally; several scientists agreed that this would be the equivalent of the time when the US was forced to enter WWII.

At that point the entire country was mobilized; car companies changed to make tanks, any company related to aviation mobilized to make bombers and fighter airplanes, ship-builders converted transport ships to destroyers and built - - with US ingenuity - - airplane carriers, U-boats and PT-boats, and the entire nation – - Democrats and Republicans alike, stood side-by-side (WOW, what an amazing concept) and supported the effort. Imagine such an effort on a global basis!

     Just Google "carbon-free energy," and you'll find numerous technologies that could be put into action quickly; Ocean wave energy is free, well researched, and could supply electricity up and down the E. – and W-coasts. As per RMI – Rocky Mountain Institute – practicing conservation would reduce energy needs by 30%; visit their web-site, and be amazed about the genius ideas are being discovered every day. Applying solar and hydrogen technology, as per Harvard prof. Dan Nocera, and Siemens of Germany, could run the entire US with enough solar electricity and water, while moving the US back into a top position in the world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTtmU2lD97o  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAkM_dV6CFs 

http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2012-01_FarewellToFossilFuels

For a list "Supporting Science Facts": See "NUTS! to the Climate Change Denialists" at http://www.DrHansKugler.com , or www.DrHans.org .

Please - !!! - Donate: IAAM is a California 501-c-3 nonprofit health education, research, organization. We pay no salaries. Donations are tax-deductible:

IAAM, 218 Ave. B, Redondo Beach, CA 90277                        God bless!

Dr. Hans J. Kugler, PhD, is a former oil industry (Standard oil of Indiana) research chemist, professor of chemistry, Roosevelt U, Chicago, and Author: "LIFE-LONG HEALTH: learn how to control your genes to stay young with age;" now available as public health education project as e-book at the non-profit price of $ 1.99. Purchase at http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/life-long-health-learn-how-to-?store=book&keyword=life-long+health%3A+learn+how+to

 
Dr. Hans Kugler, PhD
President
International Academy of Anti Aging Medicine
Redondo Beach, CA
310-634-2478
Other experts on these topics