Home > NewsRelease > GAZA WAR DIARY Fri. Feb. 20, 2015 Shabbat Shalom Day 224 4:30 Pm
Text
GAZA WAR DIARY Fri. Feb. 20, 2015 Shabbat Shalom Day 224 4:30 Pm
From:
Gail Winston -- Winston Mid East Analysis and Commentary Gail Winston -- Winston Mid East Analysis and Commentary
For Immediate Release:
Dateline: Bat Ayin,Gush Etzion, The Hills of Judea
Friday, February 20, 2015

 

Dear Family & Friends,

A quick send before candle-lighting. I need to light on time – 10 minutes early. So no time for me to do my Index or spell-check

. Sorry.

Great snow night with rain, lightning, thunder, several bouts of hail, huge gusty winds – and finally SNOW. A great big blizzard most of the night, leading to a beautiful, crystal snow morning when the sun came out & I took pictures.

Lots of yummy food being cooked by my 2 grand-daughters & grandson. Someone asked me if I was a good cook. I replied: “I’m a great cook – except now I’ve turned my kitchen over to my kids & grand kids. They’re even better.” So more time to write to all of you.

Whoa! Another storm just started up. Rain, huge winds. Back at you on Motzei Shabbos with the answers.

Have a warm, dry lovely Shabbat night, beautiful Shabbat day.

All the very best, Gail/Geula/Savta/Savta Raba/Mom

Website: WinstonIsraelInsight.com

Israel mourns death of 4-year-old injured in rock throwing attack

Thousands of Israelis arrive in Yakir for Adele Biton’s funeral, two years after the attack • Adele’s father eulogizes his daughter: “What will I do now without you? I’ll go out of my mind. You are going up to heaven now, but I can’t let you go alone.”

By Efrat Forsher and Shlomo Cesana iton

|

hoto credit: From Biton family album [archive]

adelle biton

Thousands of mourners arrived on Wednesday to pay their respects at the funeral of four-year-old Adele Biton, who died from complications of pneumonia on Tuesday, two years after she was critically wounded when Palestinians threw rocks at the car she was in on Route 5 in Samaria.

“I whispered in your ear the whole time that mommy would never leave you, and now my darling girl, I let you go, I left you, I felt that you had suffered enough,” said Biton’s mother, Adva, at the funeral.

Among those at the funeral were Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein, Economy and Trade Minister Naftali Bennett, Likud MK Miri Regev and Kulanu party member Yoav Galant.

Adva and her husband Rafi embraced their daughter’s tiny body, wrapped in a burial shroud, before she was lowered into the ground.

Nearly five years old when she died, Biton had spent half her life in treatment and rehabilitation for the severe head injury she suffered in the stone-throwing attack. Her parents were determined to see her recover, even pursuing legal action after rehabilitation center staff told them there was nothing more that could be done for her there.

In her eulogy, Adva said, “My darling, beloved daughter, my life, my enormous soul — it is so hard for me to write and to speak about you in the past tense.

“When you were a baby, you didn’t like to sleep and we struggled with you. ‘No sleep, mommy,’ you would say, and you would wake up every hour-and-a-half…now I understand that you needed the time. There is no doubt that in your short life, you managed to accomplish so much. You managed to excite those around you, to lead, to honor God’s name many times over.

“The third of [the Jewish month of] Nisan is a date that is forever etched upon my heart. That was the day that your body was murdered by villains who were trying, and will continue to try for the rest of their lives, to destroy us. But your heart continued to beat. You went through a period of horrible physical anguish. I saw [on Tuesday] the suffering in your eyes, how much you fought for each and every breath.

“I felt in my heart that something bad was about to happen. God made a decision and took you to be with Him.”

Rafi had trouble speaking, but finally said, “What will I do now without you? I’ll go out of my mind. You are going up to heaven now, but I can’t let you go alone. All that is left to do is to flip over an hour glass and to think about when I can join you.” When he finished speaking, he carried his daughter’s body in his arms to her grave at the entrance to the family’s hometown of Yakir, where Edelstein promised to get government approval for her to be buried, despite the fact that there is no cemetery there.

At the funeral, Bennett said, “What can you say about the grave of a four-year-old girl? What can you say about a girl who spent half her life learning how to laugh and the other half fighting to stay alive?”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to Biton’s grandmother, Rachel on Wednesday evening. “We are all crying with you and we are all embracing you,” he said. “May the love of this nation give you the strength to rebuild your life.”

Biton is survived by her parents, three sisters and a brother, who was born only a few months ago.

Israel mourns death of 4-year-old injured in rock throwing attack

Dedicated To Combating the Willful Rewriting of History and Fighting the Spread of Antisemitism


Äbbas? According to the Daily Beast:

Palestinian Dictator Mahmoud Abbas Gets a Free Pass
“The supposedly moderated president hugs a genocidal tyrant and bans elections while the world remains silent. Which “moderate” Arab president publicly hugged the genocidal leader of Sudan last week? Which Middle Eastern “reformer” just entered his 10th year of a four-year term? Which Western “ally” days ago ordered an investigation into a cartoonist for possibly drawing Mohammed? The answer is Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. These three stories barely made it into Western press. Why? Put simply, the bar has been set so low that they were not deemed newsworthy. An Arab leader who doesn’t allow elections? Yawn. A Middle Eastern president who embraces one of the worst mass murderers in recent history? Nothing to see here. There is a tragic disconnect between Western rhetoric and Arab reality. Abbas, if one listens to leaders of the free world, is a moderate, reformer and ally. He is better than Hamas, after all, isn’t he?”-more

* * *

3-dry bonest’s a scary situation. And our media “experts” are scared!

4-dry bones MONDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2015


Hard to believe that the Postal service both here in Israel and abroad has gotten slower (and more expensive!) over the years. Why would you send a letter when you can send an email? or post something on facebook? Or tweet your latest thoughts? So the Post Offices in our countries just can’t stand up to the competition. Of course if you want to mail somebody a few Haggadahs this means it costs a lot and takes a long time for delivery. So if you want to get your Dry Bones Haggadahs for this coming Passover, you’ll have to order now! The LSW (Long Suffering Wife) mails them out from our local post office here in Israel. And then YOUR local snail mail service takes over! Yikes! So if you want to make sure you’ll get yours in time, you’ve got to order now! For details go to http://store.drybones.com

Multi Culturalism SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 20155-dry bonesAccording to the huffington post

Shooting At Copenhagen Synagogue Leaves 1 Dead, 2 Officers Wounded
“Denmark was on high alert after a shooting near a synagogue in Copenhagen left a civilian dead and two police officers wounded early Sunday morning, hours after a gunman fatally shot a man and wounded three police officers at a free speech event in the same city. Combined, the shootings left two dead and five police officers wounded. The second attack, adjacent to a synagogue in the Krystalgade area of Copenhagen, left a male civilian dead, and two officers with wounds to the arms and legs, police said. The wounded officers were receiving treatment. Police spokesman Allan Wadsworth-Hansen said that is was unclear if the attack at the synagogue was related to the attack at the free speech event. The identity of the victim had not been released. Police scoured the city for suspects, and hours after the synagogue attack, Copenhagen police confirmed that they had shot and killed a man near the Nørrebro rail station. Police said that when they confronted the man, who was a person of interest, he opened fire and was then shot. No police officers were shot, a statement said. The man’s identity and condition were unknown. Police were investigating if he was connected to the attacks. Police had thus far not apprehended a suspect from either shootings, and were uncertain if it was the same perpetrator that had carried out both attacks. The synagogue shooter had fled on foot. Police described the suspect as a male wearing black pants and shoes, along with a gray jacket with a multi-colored portion.”

6-dry bones
It is difficult to do cartoons when the reality is so beyond belief!
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2015

7-dry bones

Has everyone become so cynical that they cannot see the simple truth? WED FEB 11 2015

* * *

8-dry bones TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2015According to FOX News:

Biden to Miss Netanyahu Address to Congress>p /> “Vice President Biden is expected to miss Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to a joint meeting of Congress — apparently because of overseas travel — as several Democratic lawmakers plan to sit out the address in protest. A White House official confirmed to Fox News on Friday that the vice president will miss the address, as he will be traveling abroad. As president of the Senate, Biden would typically attend a joint meeting of Congress, putting the White House in a bind because of its irritation about Netanyahu’s visit.

The White House has accused Netanyahu and congressional Republicans of breaching diplomatic protocol by arranging the address without coordinating with the administration. Biden’s overseas trip allows the White House to avoid the awkwardness of having the vice president sit behind Netanyahu during the address. It’s unclear where the vice president plans to travel, though his office said the unspecified trip was in the works before the prime minister’s trip was announced. Netanyahu is scheduled to address Congress on March 3.

Meanwhile, at least three prominent Democratic lawmakers have vowed to boycott the speech, saying they disapprove of House Speaker John Boehner’s decision to invite the Israeli leader without consulting President Obama. Reps. John Lewis of Georgia, G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina and Earl Blumenauer of Oregon announced their decisions earlier this week. White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the president believes individual members of Congress should make their own decisions about whether or not to attend.

This week, officials began laying the groundwork for the prospect that Biden would skip the speech, noting that he also missed a joint meeting of Congress in 2011 because of foreign travel.-more

* * *

Due to popular demand, we’ve re-opened our indiegogo site. We reached (and went beyond) our fund-raising goal but so many people have asked if they can still contribute and receive our “perks” (Dry Bones Haggadahs, dvd’s, etc.) that we’ve been forced to comply. To check it out go to http://igg.me/at/drybones

Dry Bones by Ya’acov Kirschen

The Real Threat to Europe by Bassam Tawil http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5228/islamist-threat-europe%202/1/9/15 5am

Commentators in Europe voicing opinions on the terrorist attacks atCharlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket in Paris, reverentially discussed the motivation of the terrorists, but showed distressingly little understanding of the meaning of jihad.

Europe, hedonist and dishonest, is apparently willing to cut a deal with any violent dictator, including the most potentially violent: a nuclear-threshold Iran.

To understand the fate awaiting Europe, it is necessary to listen seriously to what the upper echelons of Islam say to each other about their intentions — in Arabic. These messages are quite different from those on Western television. What they say to each other is that the mission of Islam is to lead the whole world and eradicate all other religions, as they have been made irrelevant by the Qur’an.

Charlie Hebdo’s cover after the attacks illustrates the very weakness exploited by the Islamists. The cover shown Muhammad, with a tear, aligning himself with humanism. To every Muslim on the planet, it shouted France’s weakness, its increasing surrender to the Islamist threat, and the growing strength of Islam.

The real threat to Europe does not come from local Muslims who went to fight in the ranks of ISIS. The real threat comes from Muslims already in the enclaves in Europe. Their doctrine appears openly and without reservation, in books and on websites. It is spread in local languages in mosques by the imams in their communities. These communities command immigration; then the forming of enclaves in the host country, then the eventual violent takeover of the host.

The late Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, predicted that Islam would conquer Europe without even firing a shot. To understand and explain the fate awaiting Europe, it is necessary to listen seriously to what the upper echelons of Islam say to each about their own intentions –in Arabic. These messages are quite different from those on Western television. What they say to one another is that the mission of Islam is to lead the whole world and eradicate all other religions, as they have been made irrelevant by the Qur’an.

Their doctrine appears openly and without reservation in books and on websites. It is spread in local languages in mosques by the imams in their communities throughout Europe. These communities operate according to an ancient Islamic code: They command immigration; then the forming of enclaves in the host country, then the eventual violent takeover of the host.

Once this process is complete, all the Islamic communities will unite to form the Islamic Caliphate. It will have no borders and no other identity. Then there will be Peace. This, they say, was the state of affairs under Muhammad and this will be the state of affairs in the future.

It is markedly apparent to us, however, that the world refuses to listen to what the Islamists are saying. Anyone who dares to issue a warning is called, among other names, an alarmist or a racist.

On the rare occasion when an expert does warn of the coming danger, the global media turn him into an object of scorn and derision. There seems to be less than no wish even to look at Islamist ideology. Al Jazeera, run by the Emir of Qatar to promote radical Islam, has instructed its American division not to use the words “terrorist,” “militant,” “extremist,” “jihad” and “Islamist.” Does anyone seriously think they are doing that to promote transparency?

Throughout history, society has disregarded — and often even persecuted — any messenger who says things it does not like, such as Giordano Bruno, burned at the stake in 1600 for wounding the world’s narcissism by proposing that stars were other suns that could have other planets.

Recently, global terrorism expert Steven Emerson, who made the 1994 documentary “Terrorists Amongst Us: Jihad in America,” about the dangers the U.S. would face from radical Islam, has been vilified and ridiculed for an exaggerated comment about Birmingham. His apology may have reflected an error about the facts, but his central message was right. It did not negate his warning about the future danger these Muslim enclaves will present to Europe. Paris is not the only city with areas off-limits to police. Every tourist who goes to Marseilles, Köln, Berlin and Frankfurt is warned by local inhabitants about places to be bypassed.

The same is true of Stephen Coughlin, who was a Major in a Military Intelligence unit of the U.S. Army. Asked, as a lawyer, to prepare a report on Islamic Sharia law, he delivered, in July 2007, the most meticulous, painstaking, thoroughly-documented report: “To Our Great Detriment”: Ignoring What Extremists Say about Jihad.” He was promptly fired. He had apparently come up with the “wrong” answer. The U.S. Army, it seems, had expected to hear that Sharia law was not much different from the Magna Carta.

Commentators in Europe all had opinions about the terrorist attacks at the Charlie Hebdo office and the kosher supermarket in Paris. They reverentially discussed the motivation of the terrorists, the anti-Muslim atmosphere in Europe and concern over additional global jihad attacks, but showed distressingly little understanding of the meaning of jihad. If jihad is an inner struggle, and the people who practice it are mujahideen, there are a dizzying number of bloodthirsty, cut-throat, knife-wielding men out there waging inner struggle.

9

There has been collaboration between European governments and terrorist organizations in cynical deals, supposedly to prevent attacks on European soil, writes Bassam Tawil. What will France and Europe receive in return for their stupidity, apart from the perpetually broken promise of “no further attacks”? Pictured above, one of the Kouachi brothers murders a wounded policeman outside the office of Charlie Hebdo in Paris, on 7 January 2014.

Charlie Hebdo’s cover after the attack illustrates the very weakness of Europe that is exploited by the Islamists. The cover shows Muhammad, with a tear, aligning himself with European humanism. To every Muslim on the planet, it shouted France’s weakness, its increasing surrender to the Islamist threat, and the growing strength of Islam.

The real threat to Europe does not come from local Muslims who went to fight in the ranks of ISIS and have already been returning. The real threat comes from the Muslims already in their enclaves in Europe, who are about to attack their host countries. They have seen that their riots, arson, vandalism and robberies result in frightening away the Westerners, the fire department and the police. Last New Year’s Eve alone in France, “only” 940 cars were torched– down, the French Interior Ministry proudly announced, from 1,067 the year before.

This tendency — either to kill the messenger or scorn him — also often results in blaming the victim. The Jews must have “done something,” the notion goes, for the Nazis to want to exterminate all of them; they “should have fought back,” and “it must have been their own fault.”

Radical Islamists assure the world that the attacks in Paris on Charlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket were just a Zionist plot. They claim that the motive for the attack on the kosher supermarket was to convince Jews to immigrate to Israel, to help Benjamin Netanyahu win the upcoming Israeli election.

Iran’s accomplice, Argentina’s President Cristina Fernández Kirchner, tried the same tactic, hinting that the Jews were behind the recent murder of Alberto Nisman, the federal prosecutor who was about to testify how Argentina’s leaders covered-up Iran’s responsibility for the 1994 bombing of the Jewish community center (AMIA) in Buenos Aires.

There has also been collaboration between European governments and terrorist organizations in cynical deals, supposedly to prevent attacks on European soil. This collusion is most likely the reason France has refused to designate Hezbollah a terrorist organization for so long. It is also most likely the reason Hassan Nasrallah was so ridiculously quick to condemn the terrorist attacks in Paris, despite his relentless support for killing “infidels” and those who “disrespect” Islam. This list includes such international “criminals” as Salman Rushdie for his book, Satanic Verses; Anwar Sadat, who made peace with Israel, and Yasser Arafat for signing the Oslo Accords.

Another suspicious example of “cozy” international relations is the “temporary” EU removal of Hamas from its list of designated terrorist groups, despite it being crystal-clear that Hamas is devastating its own people as well as the Palestinian Authority and Israel, and that it never misses a chance to sabotage any attempt to reach a peace agreement.

What is not clear so far is what France and the rest of Europe will receive in return for their stupidity, apart — as we keep seeing — from the perpetually broken promise of “no further attacks.”

Europe, hedonist and dishonest, is apparently willing to cut a deal with any violent dictator, including the most potentially violent: a nuclear-threshold Iran.

Today’s apologists for terrorist organizations are tomorrow’s victims.

Bassam Tawil is a scholar based in the Middle East.

Is This the Way to Run a War? by Shoshana Bryen http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5233/aumf-combat-islamic-state February 19, 2015 at 4:00 am

How does a government “get beyond the crisis” without a plan to resolve the crisis?

The Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) is an odd document, not yet debated Congress. Among other points, it prohibits “enduring offensive ground operations,” but without defining them.

President Obama seems to want it both ways — to oppose American participation in large-scale battles in Iraq, but to have the “flexibility” to order them; to prohibit ground operations but to have American troops in place to carry them out.

The administration thus appears to remain without an articulated strategy to prosecute the war IS launched against us, our allies and a broad range of civilian non-combatants.

A Jordanian, 21 Egyptians and 4 Americans – sounds like the start of a bad joke, but it is not.

They, along with thousands of others, have been murdered by the Islamic State (IS, ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh) in the Middle East, and by Boko Haram in Nigeria. The victims are Muslim, Christian (Nigerian Christians, Egyptian Copts beheaded in Libya, plus Yazidis, Chaldeans and 45 members of smaller sects in Iraq burned alive), and others (Japanese hostages and some who professed no religion). They are killed in places where governments have lost control of their territory to bands of increasingly well-armed Islamic radical forces.

There is a war going on in a far part of the world, and increasingly IS finds fellow travelers — thus far in France, Britain and Denmark — willing to attack in the West. The U.S. has had citizens killed at home — kudos to Congress for finally making it possible for the Army to award Purple Hearts to the casualties of the jihadi attack at Ft. Hood — but a connection to IS is not established.

On the other hand, at the same time, 300 graves in a Jewish cemetery in France were desecrated, and more than 30 homes in Madison, WI were spray-painted with anti-Semitic graffiti.

The Obama administration, which has said it would “degrade and destroy” IS, has put forward two documents to help explain America’s strategic posture toward organizations wedded to “violence against unbelievers” and the insufficiently enthusiastic.

First came the “Authorization for the Use of Military Force” (AUMF), then a new “National Security Strategy” (NSS).

But there is more.

The AUMF is an odd document, not yet debated in Congress. Among other points, it prohibits “enduring offensive ground operations,” but without defining them. The language suggests the U.S. would remain committed only to air strikes, training and Special Operations. Ground troops, however, are often essential in warfare across wide-open spaces such as the western Iraqi desert.

Kurdish Peshmerga were on the ground in the battle for Kobane, but Kurdish forces are limited and remain in their own areas, and have not been equipped. Beyond them, there are no trained and ready troops except, perhaps, Iranian or Hezbollah, both of which have acknowledged having forces in Iraq. Neither should make Iraqis, or Americans, comfortable, especially in light of Iran’s desire to spread extremist Shi’ite, Persian control over the Middle East to restore the Persian Empire.

To complicate matters, the AUMF has broad exceptions to its prohibition on “enduring ground offensive operations.” The current 3,000 ground troops in Iraq are explicitly excluded from any new restrictions. In addition, according to at least one report, Special Operations forces; Joint Terminal Attack Controllers, the experts who pinpoint targets for air strikes; and search and rescue personnel can be deployed by the President without returning to Congress for an amended authorization. Together, they could amount to thousands more troops.

Those who believe that an American-led ground war in the Middle East is necessary call the AUMF too rigid and limited; others fear it has the potential for an expanded war, to which they object.

Appearing to weigh in on the side of those who do not want the U.S. committed to large-scale military operations against IS, the NSS counsels “strategic patience.”

National Security Council Advisor Susan Rice explained, “We are committed to seizing the future that lies beyond the crisis of the day [emphasis added], and pursuing a vision of the world as it can and should be.” She added that the U.S. will “look at the world with a long-term perspective, influencing the trajectory of major shifts in the security landscape today in order to secure our national interests in the future.”

There is no way to take such pronouncements as “the future that lies beyond the crisis of the day” or “visions” seriously as policy-making tools. How does a government get “beyond the crisis” without a plan to resolve the crisis? Regardless of the “long term perspective,” which the administration has committed to paper, the “crisis of the day” appears to be what she is, in fact, talking about. And the “crisis of the day” appears to require ground troops.

While the administration was saying it had not identified “moderates” to receive American arms, the CIA, it turns out, had trained more than 5,000 Syrian rebels. Maybe they were not really “moderate.” That would account for why thousands of them appear to have defected to IS at the end of last year. While others continue to arm and train Syrians, one quarter of the U.S.-approved brigades have since been dropped from the list of “acceptable” militias, and money for others has been cut.

You can trust American troops, though, right? Now, some 4,000 members of the American 3rd Brigade Combat Team of the 4th Infantry Division from Ft. Carson are being dispatched to Kuwait where they will be the first heavy brigade to fight in Iraq if that becomes the Commander in Chief’s decision.

Wait…what?

Yes, 3,000 already in Iraq and another 4,000 in Kuwait would amount to 7,000 pairs of “boots on the ground.” The 3rd Brigade Combat Team, which was deployed to Iraq four times, is equipped with tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles. For more than a year, its soldiers have trained primarily in armored combat skills, applied in ground battles against an opposing army. From a military perspective, this is appropriate as certain combat skills have been degraded or lost in the past decade of mostly small-unit urban warfare or anti-terrorist operations.

But the AUMF specifically prohibited “enduring offensive ground operations.”

Keep this in mind because the letter sent by President Obama to lawmakers with the AUMF said, “Local forces, rather than U.S. military forces” should be used for large-scale operations.

“The authorization I propose would provide the flexibility to conduct ground combat operations in other, more limited circumstances, such as rescue operations involving U.S. or coalition personnel or the use of special operations forces to take military action against (Islamic State) leadership.”

Rescue operations rarely require tanks, and Special Operations never do.

10

The 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division conducts a fire coordination exercise with Abrams tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles at Fort Carson, Colorado, in September 2014. (Image source: 3rd Brigade Combat Team Facebook Page)

President Obama seems to want it both ways — to oppose American participation in large-scale battles in Iraq but to have the “flexibility” to order them; to prohibit ground operations but to have American troops in place to carry them out.

The administration thus appears to remain without an articulated strategy to prosecute the war IS has launched against us, our allies and a broad range of civilian non-combatants. It remains to be seen whether the President is posing as the sleeping giant of American military might, or whether he is truly on a quest for the “future that lies beyond the crisis of the day” and his “vision of the world as it can and should be.”

Washington wants to extend the time it would take Tehran to break out to the bomb; for Netanyahu, that’s not enough BY GEORGE JAHN February 18, 2015, 8:28 am

11-Centrifuges enriching uranium

Centrifuges enriching uranium (illustrative photo: US Department of Energy/Wikimedia Commons)

VIENNA (AP) — The US and Iran are inching toward a nuclear deal that’s not as good as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants — but not as bad as he says it is shaping up to be.

Israel says any pact short of totally dismantling Iranian programs with weapons-making potential is deeply flawed. Netanyahu’s planned speech to the US Congress March 3 — just a few weeks before the target date for a general agreement — gives him a high-profile soapbox to make his case.

Washington’s approach is to degrade Iran’s programs in order to extend the time Iran would need to make a nuclear weapon from the present few months to at least a year. US officials say that would give the international community enough reaction time to do what it takes to stop Tehran.

Ahead of the next round of negotiations this week, here’s a look at any potential agreement and how effective it may be.

Good deal or bad deal?

Relying on an inspection regime seems dicey considering the history of nations the world over — including Israel itself — acquiring nuclear weapons through deceit. And an Iranian nuclear weapon would further tilt the already unstable Middle Eastern strategic equation.

“It is one thing to try and verify that they are not bypassing you and it is another to verify that there is nothing to verify,” Israeli Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz told The Associated Press.

But defenders of such a deal say that such an evasion would be very difficult. Daryl Kimball of the Washington-based Arms Control Association says tough monitoring would result in “enough time to detect and disrupt” any Iranian effort to work on a bomb.

In any case, the option of pressing Iran toward total dismantling seems unrealistic. In a world where the US has no stomach for another Middle Eastern military involvement, and Russia and China are unlikely to join a total embargo on the Iranian economy, proponents of the possible deal see it as the least bad option.

What’s the main dispute and who’s ahead?

With only a few weeks left until the March deadline, Iran — which insists it does not want nuclear arms — seems to be ahead in pushing the other side to compromise.

The main dispute is over the size and potency of Iran’s uranium enrichment program, which can make both reactor fuel and the fissile core of a weapon. The US, along with Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany, came to the table demanding that Tehran dismantle 80 to 90 percent of the nearly 10,000 centrifuges now turning out enriched uranium along with all of the 8,000 or so other machines set up but not working.

But faced with Iranian resistance, diplomats now say the US is prepared to accept 4,500 operating centrifuges — perhaps more — if Tehran agrees to constraints on their efficiency.

Washington has also compromised on initial demands that constraints on Iran’s nuclear program last 20 years or more. Diplomats say it is now ready to accept 10 to 12 years.

Can the deadlock be skirted?

Diplomats familiar with the talks say the US may be prepared to accept higher centrifuge numbers if their potential to enrich uranium is reduced.

One idea being discussed with Iran would limit the size of its stockpiles of uranium gas, which is fed into centrifuges for enrichment. The amount of gas Tehran would be allowed to store would depend on the number centrifuges Iran keeps.

Second, Iran could commit to shipping out most of the enriched uranium it produces leaving it without enough to make a bomb.

A third possibility is reconfiguring the setup of the centrifuges. The machines are set up in series, called cascades, to spin uranium gas to increasingly higher concentrations of enriched uranium, and reconfiguring the cascades can significantly reduce the amount of enriched uranium produced at their tail end.

Will a deal leave Iran on the nuclear weapons threshold?

The US administration continues to insist that it will not accept any deal that does not extend the time Iran could make a nuclear bomb to at least a year.

Kimball, of the Arms Control Association, says that there is no alternative to the US approach. Hopes that Iran will substantially bend on centrifuge numbers after more than a decade of resistance are “a dangerous illusion,” he says.

Olli Heinonen, a former head of the Iran file at the UN nuclear agency, says the mix could work, but only if Iran agrees to run no more than 2,000 to 4,000 centrifuges — something Tehran says it will not accept.

“The killer is the number of centrifuges,” says Heinonen.

David Albright of the Institute for Science and Security in Washington notes that — even if such a deal is sealed — it becomes difficult to monitor because of all the moving parts.

“The more elements you add, the more Iran can break individually,” he says.

And he says that even destroying all of Iran’s centrifuges, as Israel demands, would probably leave Tehran in a position to rebuild enough to make a bomb within two years in a “crash program” applying decades of expertise.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press.


The malicious, hypocritical, evil media 12-Dr. Haim Shine by Dr. Haim Shine

As an Israeli citizen, I am ashamed of the media’s treatment of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It’s hard to believe how much malice, hypocrisy and evil can be spread over the pages of a newspaper like Yedioth Ahronoth, and how much cynicism and schadenfreude can be concentrated in the facial expressions of news anchor Yonit Levi and the rest of the Channel 2 news staff.

For many years, the Jewish people have specialized in unjustified hatred — hatred for which we paid a heavy price years ago, including the loss of independence, the destruction of the Temple and exile. Let it be known that those who sow hatred will reap destruction. It is a shame that the goal of unseating the Right seems to justify almost any means.

The media put immense pressure on the state comptroller to move up the release of his report on overspending at the Prime Minister’s Residence, so that it would be published before the elections. To the media’s disappointment, he satisfied only half of their craving. The report offers criticism regarding “proportionality,” but included no criminal findings: “There was no apparent deviation from procedure in the technical-legal sphere,” the report concludes. The prime minister said that many of the report’s recommendations have already been implemented and that he is committed to implementing all of them. The material that the state comptroller transferred to the attorney general on topics not included in the report, and the information that the state attorney asked to see on one topic that is in the report (the employment of an external electrician), is already in his possession. The attorney general now has to determine whether there was any kind of ethical impropriety or criminal act.

The process takes time, but the media has its own schedule: Motivated by a personal vendetta — the likes of which I have never seen but have only read about (the so-called Hunting Season between the Haganah and the Irgun) — the media is demanding that the attorney general immediately launch a criminal investigation. We can only be thankful that at least someone at the State Attorney’s Office has declared that, with all due respect, the attorney general does not work for the media.

One can understand what motivates prominent cultural figures like Amos Oz, A.B. Yehoshua, Sami Michael and their students to preach against the Right. During moments of soul searching, they discovered that the people had long since abandoned them and are no longer interested in dreams of a new Middle East, coexistence with violent neighbors and a return to ’67 borders. Intellectuals who are unable to attract the attention of those around them are hurt to the very depths of their souls, just like Hasidic leaders who find they no longer have followers. They are taking out their anger and frustration against the majority of the nation, whose opinions — much to their dismay — will not be changed.

It is, however, very difficult to understand media outlets that — in order to deal with the loss of money, influence and readers — are prepared to destroy the most fundamental infrastructure of a democratic state. The infrastructure that is there to ensure that the country’s leadership is changed via democratic elections and not by way of slander, gossip and rumors. Journalists who use the tremendous power they posses to serve the golden calf become susceptible to corruption.

The State of Israel is facing existential challenges. The War of Independence for the Jewish people’s right to live in security and peace in their homeland is not yet over. It is a shame that there are people who are prepared to pull apart Israeli society in order to make money. There is no Jewish future without optimism. Most Israelis understand perfectly how the media is trying to bring them down. We waited 2,000 years to stop being victims. The Jewish people are not interested in being victims once again, this time to power-hungry publishers and journalists for hire.

The malicious, hypocritical, evil media by Dr. Haim Shine

Send to a Friend

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/images/icons/send_to_friend.gif

|

Print

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/images/icons/print.gif

|

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/images/icons/facebook.gif http://www.israelhayom.com/site/images/icons/twitter.gif

Netanyahu: Livni is dangerous for Israel

PM Benjamin Netanyahu: Media frenzy surrounding comptroller’s report is a smokescreen meant to allow Tzipi Livni to sneak into the Prime Minister’s Office • Livni and Isaac Herzog would enable the rise of a Hamastan in Judea and Samaria, PM warns.

By Mati Tuchfeld and Shlomo Cesana

In his first public remarks directly referencing the state comptroller’s report on expenses at the prime minister’s residences, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Wednesday, “The media frenzy surrounding the comptroller’s report is a smokescreen meant to allow Tzipi Livni to sneak into the Prime Minister’s Office.”Speaking to a group of Likud activists in Ashkelon, Netanyahu said, “The reason they’re trying to hide [Livni] and divert the public’s attention with other things is a good one: Tzipi Livni is a danger to the country.”


13-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a meeting with Likud activists in AshkelonPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a meeting with Likud activists in Ashkelon, Wednesday
Photo credit: Likud Facebook page

Netanyahu said that if Livni became prime minister, she would negotiate with Hamas. He mentioned an incident last year when Livni, who was justice minister and chief negotiator with the Palestinians at the time, held an unauthorized meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

“She went to Abbas against my explicit instructions and against a cabinet decision and she met with him a few days before he signed a unity agreement with Hamas,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister also slammed Zionist Union leader Isaac Herzog, saying, “Herzog, Livni’s partner, also said he would run to Abbas, who is in a unity government with Hamas. And both [Herzog and Livni] applauded the disengagement [from the Gaza Strip in 2005]. At the time, Herzog called it a ‘historic move’ and said a ‘responsible entity would take over the territory.’ Buji (Herzog’s nickname) and Tzipi would run to Abbas in Ramallah after the elections and negotiate with him on concessions.

Their concessions would lead to the establishment of a second Hamastan — in Judea and Samaria. This is the truth they are trying to hide from the public, but we will make sure this truth is exposed.”

Livni responded to Netanyahu’s comments, saying, “The man who gave in to Hamas in the military realm and lost to Abbas in the diplomatic realm is the last person who should preach to anyone about security. I was there and I know. The deterioration of relations with the U.S. is a danger to Israel, the socioeconomic gaps in Israeli society are a danger to Israel, poverty is a danger to Israel and the tunnels under the homes of Gaza border area residents are a danger to Israel. All of this happened during Netanyahu’s nine years in power.

“If I were Netanyahu, I would not accuse people of being a danger to Israel. This is not recommended. Netanyahu blames everyone, including (former housekeeping supervisor) Meni Naftali, for his scandals and failures — everyone, except himself. Incidentally, the only person hiding behind anything is Netanyahu — behind Meni Naftali, behind his wife and behind extreme remarks used to spin the embarrassment exposed by the comptroller’s report.”

Livni and Herzog, accompanied by a number of other members of the Zionist Union list, toured the Gaza border area on Wednesday. “We will hit terrorism hard, we won’t release prisoners and we will not conduct any negotiations with Hamas,” Herzog vowed.

Meanwhile, in a further comment on the comptroller’s report, Netanyahu wrote on his Facebook page on Wednesday, “I respect the comptroller’s report and am aware of the criticisms contained therein. Many of them have already been addressed, as demonstrated by the dramatic drop in spending at the prime minister’s residences in 2013. I am determined to continue lowering the spending even further, with maximum attention and focus on efficiency.”

Netanyahu also cited comments by attorney Yaakov Borovsky, saying, “A detailed audit of the prime minister’s residences has never been done before in the history of the country, and certainly not during an elections period. It is unfortunate that the State Comptroller’s Office did not do a precise comparison with the audit of the President’s Residence. If this was not an elections period, it is doubtful this report would have been characterized as special.”

Netanyahu: Livni is dangerous for Israel

14- palestinian media watch logo

Bulletin

Feb. 19, 2015

Fatah glorifies Japanese and Palestinian terrorists

Japanese terrorists who killed 24 in attack on Israeli airport in 1972

are “heroes” who “sacrificed their lives for Palestine

Palestinian terrorists who killed 8 in hotel attack in 1975 are “heroic self-sacrificing fighters”

Palestinian terrorist who planned Olympics massacre is “the Martyr Commander, the Red Prince”

by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

It is not only Palestinian terrorist killers who are praised as heroes by Fatah, the party headed by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. Fatah recently posted on its official Facebook page a tribute to the Japanese terrorists who participated in a terror attack in Israel in 1972 in which 24 people were killed.

“They were neither Arab nor Muslim, yet they sacrificed their lives for Palestine,” Fatah stated, posting a photo of a monument for the terrorists in Beirut, Lebanon.

[Facebook, “Fatah – The Main Page”, Feb. 3, 2015]

On May 30, 1972, three members of the Japanese Red Army, Takeshi Okudaira, Yasuyuki Yasuda and Kozo Okamoto, who had been recruited by the Palestinian terror organization Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), attacked passengers at Israel’s Lod (Tel Aviv) airport, killing 8 Israelis and 16 foreign tourists and wounding over 70. Okudaira and Yasuda were killed during the attack, while Okamoto was arrested.

Palestinian Media Watch has documented that Abbas’ Fatah movement has a policy to glorify terrorists – both from the past and the present. Two days ago, Fatah glorified the terror attack on the Tel Aviv Savoy Hotel in 1975, in which 8 were killed:

“From the chronicles of the revolution: The Savoy Hotel after its destruction by Fatah’s heroic self-sacrificing fighters (Fedayeen) – March 6, 1975.

The multi-story Savoy Hotel became a ruin, a ruin.

A hotel, neighborhood and streets went up in flames, up in flames,

thanks to your men’s determination, O Yasser [Arafat], Yasser [Arafat].”

[Facebook, “Fatah – The Main Page”,

Feb. 17, 2015]

On the same day, Fatah also glorified the planner of the Munich Olympics massacre in which 11 Israeli athletes were murdered in 1972. Fatah posted a picture of the terrorist with the following text:

“Ali Hassan Salameh, the Martyr Commander, the Red Prince. The glory in his name is enough.” [Facebook, “Fatah – The Main Page”, Feb. 17, 2015]

Recently, PMW documented that Fatah and its youth division Shabiba released statements praising “Martyrs” (Shahids) for “watering the land of Palestine with their pure blood.” This PMW report also showed that Fatah in recent months has honored seven different terrorists who between them have killed 63 people.

The text on the monument in Beirut honoring the Japanese airport murderers says:

“The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine The Japanese Red Army

A monument for the heroes of the Lod airport operation (i.e., terror attack) in occupied Palestine

Bassem - Takeshi Okudaira Born in 1945; died as a Martyr (Shahid) in 1972 during the Lod airport operation

Salah – Yasuyuki Yasuda Born in 1945; died as a Martyr in 1972 during the Lod airport operation

‘Martyr of Freedom’ Yussuf – Takao Himori Born in 1947

Died as a Martyr in 2002 after setting himself on fire to protest the Israeli invasion of the West Bank

Nizar – Osamu Maruoka Born in 1950

Died as a Martyr in 2011 from an illness [incurred] during his incarceration.”

[Facebook, “Fatah – The Main Page”, Feb. 3, 2015]

Takao Himori was a supporter of the PA who set himself on fire and burned to death in Tokyo, Japan, in 2002, to protest Israeli policy.

Osamu Maruoka was one of the leaders of the Japanese Red Army. He was arrested in Japan in 1987, and died while serving a life sentence in prison in 2011.

Fatah glorifies Japanese and Palestinian terrorists

Highlighting concerns over Iran’s failure to cooperate over its nuclear program, a confidential International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report, obtained by journalists on Thursday, said that Iran is still not in “full cooperation” with the IAEA’s two year investigation meant to resolve outstanding questions surrounding the weaponization aspects of Iran’s nuclear program.The IAEA is focused on the possible military dimensions (PMDs) of Iran’s nuclear program and seeks to determine whether Iran has conducted explosives testing or “other activity that could be used to develop nuclear bombs.” Reuters reported that a diplomat, speaking on the current negotiations, said, “With respect to PMD, progress is very slow, if there is any progress at all at this point in time.”

Iran continues to prohibit the IAEA from visiting sites connected to PMDs, including Parchin, a military complex “dedicated to research, development, and production of ammunition, rockets, and high explosives.” New imagery from Parchin suggests Iran has been re-asphalting the site to cover up work related to past weaponization activities.

Iran has a history of concealing its nuclear activities, eluding inspections and violating its commitments. In 2002, it was revealed that Iran was working on two secret nuclear facilities: Natanz and Arak. The IAEA reported that Iran was in violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Additionally, the agency declared that for the previous 18 years Iran had “secretly developed technologies to produce highly enriched uranium.” Then, in October 2003, Iran signed the Tehran Declaration with Britain, Germany, and France and agreed to suspend enrichment during the period of negotiations and comply with the IAEA. Two years later, the negotiations stalled, and the IAEA referred Iran to the U.N. Security Council for non-compliance of the NPT due its continued enrichment and failure to cooperate with the IAEA. Current Iranian President Hassan Rouhani boasted in May 2013 that “he and the regime utterly flouted a 2003 agreement with the IAEA in which it promised to suspend all uranium enrichment and certain other nuclear activities.”

Last month, Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated that any final agreement requires “robust monitoring and transparency measures to maximize the international community’s ability to detect quickly any attempt by Iran to break out overtly or covertly.” Iran’s failure to comply with the IAEA underscores concerns about relying on an inspections regime to prevent any future Iranian nuclear breakout.

Highlighting concerns over Iran’s failure to cooperate over its nuclear program, a confidential International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report, obtained by journalists

Smarlation: a legal, medical, technical, business or personal document translated into one of the world’s 80 or so written languages

No matter where you live or what language you speak, at some point you will likely need a legal, medical, technical, business or personal document translated into one of the world’s 80 or so written languages. Or maybe you’ll want to develop a website, app or book for people in several different countries. That’s why Israeli translator Gil Tamir decided to parlay 30 years of experience (and his own money) into Smartlation, an innovative search engine using a patent-pending algorithm that analyzes data from thousands of registered translators in order to match users with those who best meet their exact requirements and budget. “Our goal is to create a comprehensive solution for both the business community and individuals who have very specific needs in a translator,” says Tamir, who launched the site in October with cofounder Dan Gat following a year of development. In today’s global village, the need to translate myriad materials has pushed the worldwide market for outsourced language services and technology to an estimated $37.19 billion in 2014, according to the market-research firm Common Sense Advisory. The language-services market is expected to reach $47 billion by 2018. “Searching through hundreds of websites and blogs to find someone with the right language skills, and who fits the budget, can be very time-consuming,” says Tamir. “We’ve come up with a platform that can reduce the entire course of action to just a few minutes. Our platform also manages the whole process to make it as simple as possible.” Billed as a global online marketplace for independent translators and customers seeking translations, Smartlation currently has about 4,000 registered translators providing categorized services in more than 70 languages to a growing pool of users. “We are receiving new registrations every day, from translators as well as clients,” says Tamir, speaking to ISRAEL21c from his office in Haifa. (via Israel21c)

Smarlation: a legal, medical, technical, business or personal document translated

News Media Interview Contact
Name: Gail Winston
Group: Winston Mid-East Commentary
Dateline: Bat Ayin, Gush Etzion, The Hills of Judea Israel
Cell Phone: 972-2-673-7225
Jump To Gail Winston -- Winston Mid East Analysis and Commentary Jump To Gail Winston -- Winston Mid East Analysis and Commentary
Contact Click to Contact
Other experts on these topics