From the Mind of Sha’i ben-Tekoa
Transcript
http://www.deprogramprogram.com

Date: January 13, 2015/   ?? ??? ???”?
Parasha: Vaeira / ????
Title:  Bravo, Bibi!

Copyright: Sha’i ben-Tekoa 2014
www.deprogramprogram.com

Shalom laYehudim, Shalom laBnai Noach, Shalom laGoyim. It’s the evening of the 4th day, kafgimmel  beTeves, Parashas Vaeira, tav-shin-ayin-heh, the evening of the 3rd day, Tuesday, 13, January 2015, Webcasting from the State of Israel, if not the Land of Israel according to the State president today.

Today, during the funerals for the four Jews murdered in Paris last week, the president expressed sorrow that they returned to the State of Israel like this and not as they had wished.

The State of Israel, not the Land of Israel. Ruvy Rivlin is a proud Israeli, proud to be a non-practicing Jew.

But, of course, the top story in the MSM was the Prime Minister’s behavior in Paris during possibly the largest political rally in the history of the human race. At one point, the prime minister was in the second rank of statesmen walking the route; moments later, he had maneuvered himself into the first rank to be just two men away from the center where Francois Hollande was. The Enlightened here sneered that he was a being a rude Israeli, even a pushy Jew.

It turns out he only decided to go to Paris because Lieberman and Naftali Bennett were going. Holland also at first informed him that it was best to stay away for security concerns, a not unreasonable thought.

Some of you may remember the book, a thriller, and movie of the late 1960s, The Day of the Jackal, based on a real attempt (several real attempts actually) to murder Charles De Gaulle over his handling of the Arab terrorism in Algeria by disgruntled colonists, and this may have crossed the minds of French security officers.

In the book and the movie, during a public appearance in which De Gaulle was to appear, the assassin positioned himself in an apartment along the route.

But then when Bibi changed his mind and told Hollande that he was coming, at that point Hollande formally invited him but then also understandably invited the deranged Arab Muslim terrorist Abbas to come too. Some of the Enlightened media boys and girls here thought it was Hollande’s revenge for Bibi forcing himself on France, but there is another reason, I think.

France has embassies and consulates in scores or Muslim countries, staffed by Foreign Office employees. France’s businessmen do business in Araby, and by not inviting Abbas after inviting Bibi, for balance, he could have been inviting assassins in these scores of countries to attack and murder diplomats, tourists and businessmen. Hollande may not have wanted that on his conscience.

Fact of the matter is, the Arabs have become the highwaymen of the whole world, now the global village. Centuries ago and for centuries the Muslim cruisers of the Barbary Coast had preyed upon Christian shipping, hijacking and hostage-taking in the Mediterranean but not around the globe. They were confined to the inland sea.

Today, though, given modern transportation, Muslims are everywhere.

In the formative centuries of American growth, the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, there was likely not     one Muslim in the Thirteen Colonies and the original Thirteen States. Delusional Muslims like Barack Obama fantasize an Islamic presence in those generations because they covet American wealth and in this way write for themselves a fictitious title deed for America, claiming America is as much the product of Islamic civilization as Christian and Jewish.

This is nonsense, of course. Muslims had zero, absolutely zero impact on the founding of the United States of America, but Obama from the first days of his rule has peddled this fantasy.

In the States, though, as Israel assessed Netanyahu’s behavior in the great march, it was encouraging, yesterday, heart-warming really, to see the MSM criticize Obama for basically refusing to link arms literally with other statesmen critical of Islam and of Muslims. He was a no-show.

Well, don’t ever expect Barack Hussein Obama, whose middle name is that of the second Muslim martyr assassinated in the 7th century, to stand against Islam. He claims that the problem is not Islam but “violent extremism.” And today I watched a State Department spokeswoman, sounding pretty much like an Arab, saying, “Yes.  Islamic terrorism is a part of the problem but only part because there are violent extremists elsewhere,” though of course she did not name even one.

Two more years of Obama now, if Congress does act to remove this man, and I fear they won’t. And that failure will indicate a serious degeneration in American culture. America was the violent product of feisty people who did not like being dictated to by a government.

Thomas Jefferson thought a healthy society was probably due for some kind of rebellion/revolution every twenty years, the principle being that the past should have no hold on the present. Every generation is entitled to steer the ship of state as it sees fit.

And now, for the first time in American history, a president is damaging the country and whatever etiology explains his behavior, he should be removed from office. And that the U.S. Congress does not rise up and call for that is sad testimony to the degenerate state of American society; with “degenerate” the best word to use for the situation.

To generate is to create new life, but the census figures show the opposite; American is de-generating. Those Americans of European background in America are these days not having enough children to sustain their heritage, culture and common values. These Americans, spiritual descendants of the original ones, are basically committing suicide.

Millions, tens of millions of American babies over the last Biblical generation of forty years have been destroyed in the womb. Millions more potential babies have been prevented from coming to life via so-called birth control medical technology when it should be more accurately called birth prevention devices and chemicals.

And if the U.S. Congress does not take steps to remove this Muslim missionary from the White House, America will pay dearly.

But I digress. Here the Enlightened were embarrassed today by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s behavior in Paris, when I think he deserves nothing but highest praise and even a battlefield citation for bravery. Bibi, like the commando he used to be, deliberately put himself in harm’s way, taking a chance that a sniper might shoot at him. I think the expression on his face in some of these visuals hints at that; I think he was frightened. I think it was Ben Rhodes, the Obama flunky who called Bibi a coward using a barnyard vulgarity…and that was another symptom of the corruption of American society, the filthy talk.

Here was Bibi literally putting his life on the line for what he believed in.

He refused to be excluded from the front rank because he will not tolerate the untruth of world anti-Jewry that it is wrong for Muslims to murder twelve journalists – – ‘Je suis Charlie’ — but when it comes to the murder of four Jews, well, you know, the Ancient Ones are the Jews’ victims. Jimmy Carter appeared on the deJudaized Jon Stewart program and said as much. What has happened to the Ancient Ones has contributed to the atmosphere in France, he said.

What Bibi did was also done, I think, in the name of sanity. There is no way one can separate those two horrors last week committed by people in cahoots with one another. One slaughter was horrible but the other was not?

These Muslim assassins are clear in their own minds that not only are the Jews Allah’s most hated people in the world, so are the Europeans who continue to back Israel to a degree. Yes, they have become intellectual vassals of the Muslims in waving the flag of Balestine – they want to see a Balestinian state — but not to the degree they support the true Muslim drive to obliterate Israel altogether, G-d forbid, and for that in Muslim eyes they remain guilty. In the minds of the murderers, the targets at Charlie Hebdo and that grocery were one and the same, and any attempt to separate them is intolerable.

And that is why Bibi was right not to passively accept an inferior place in the March of Statesmen. Last week, France was bloodied by Muslim maniacs and so were Jews living in France.  Since Israel is the state of the Jews, it would have been perfectly all right if Netanyahu and Hollande had linked arms together in the center.

But the Israeli Left today had nothing but a sneer for their pushy Prime Minister who refused to be shunted aside.

Yeah, the Enlightened here were pretty ticked off today at Prime Minister Netanyahu for his rude behavior. They also accused him from jumping the line into one of the buses that transported the statesmen to the parade route. This is more behavior shamefully associated with uncouth Israelis.

But no less, they were outraged when he addressed the Jewish community who welcomed him with love and affection, and he told them Israel was where they should be living. He pitched, in other words, Zionism, exactly as his late father and men of that generation did in the first half of the 20th century, which effort they made without a smidgen of embarrassment or shame.

In those decades, Zionism was not yet accused of stealing Balestine from the Balestinians and creating an apartheid state. The movement was to summon Jews from all over the world to return to the Land in their prayers for thousands of years; to return the Land to habitability, for it was wasteland everywhere. There was no shame in the first Zionists pitching their dream to other Jews, and here was Bibi doing exactly the same thing: talking like a missionary for the Zionist movement.

The Enlightened, though, were scandalized. The former MK Nitzan Horowitz, the only publicly proud sodomite in that assembly, said, “The Jews in France are not a foreign entity in France but citizens and there is no need to bring them to Israel.”

And the head of the so-called Reform Movement in Israel, Gilad Kariv said, “This is no time to preach to them to make Aliyah or hint that Jews don’t have a safe place to live outside of Israel’s borders.” That’s right, Rabbi Gilad: the Jews are perfectly safe in France.

Imagine: Jews for thousands of years have prayed daily and more than once each day, to return to the Land of Israel, and here are these two Jews, one portraying himself as a rabbi, telling other Jews not to come because it will reflect poorly on the Jews they leave behind. You know, charges of dual loyalty.

So plaudits to Bibi for his Commando-like character of striving toward a goal and not quitting. He became famous in the 1980s for his intelligent television commentary in the States in defense of Israel and that is exactly what he did in Paris. He refused to knuckle under to the irrationality of separating what happened at Charlie Hebdo and that Jewish grocery just before the Holy Sabbath.

Same murderers, same Muslim maniacs. Colleagues of one another.

Not that his visit was without some of his annoying traits. When speaking to the Jewish community in the Grand Synagogue, he orated, “The truth and righteousness are with us. Our common enemy is extreme Islam, not Islam, not regular extremists, but extreme Islam. Extreme Islam doesn’t hate the West because of Israel but hates Israel because it is an organic part of the West.”

Well, I disagree. Long before the notion of “the West” came into the world, Muslims hated, oppressed and humiliated Jews. The West, as that term is used today, had nothing to do with the abuse that Jews suffered in every century of Islam’s fourteen.

In any case, I reject the notion of “extreme Islam.” What is that? I think what he had in mind was, “violent Islam.” It would be a better world if Muslims, still wanting to convert the world, renounced violence as a way to achieve that. How’s about imitating the Jews who want to change the world by setting an example for the world?

Not by force; not by demanding conversion to our way of thinking or get your head chopped off.

The problem is that separating Islam from violence is not an easy thing. The Qur’an is an immensely confusing record of Muhammad’s battles in which he deceives, plunders, rapes, kidnaps and beheads.

I think it is wishful thinking on the part of our Prime Minister and others like him to push the idea of a peaceful Islam in the center vs. the violent fringes, when that is a misperception of the entire culture. It is the violent in that culture who take power, like a Saddam Hussein, a Muammar Qaddafi, two truly barbaric, sub-civilized brutish men.

Public opinion polls have always made clear that most of the Arabs in Judea and Samaria identify with HAMAS which is openly Muslim, and less with Fatah the allegedly secular, nationalist, moderate, peace-inclined, live-and-let live-with-the-Jews type of Arabs — which is another gaseous confection with little reality beneath it.

We are dealing here with Muslims who chronically exhibit no commitment to truth, let alone justice. Theirs is a world of constant warfare between individuals and groups; and with the Jews, well, it’s all there in the Qur’an.

The Jews are Islam’s No. 1 enemy against whom it is possible to do and/or say anything.

In 1929, the Mufti said the Jews had massacred 500 Believers in Jerusalem and thus ignited the three-day pogrom in which 137 Jews were butchered.

In 2002, Saeb Erekat the peace negotiator claimed the Jews had also massacred 500 “Palestinians” this time in Jenin.

And yesterday there was President of Turkey Erdogan saying that the Jews had massacred 25,000 Ancient Palestinians in Gaza. This was his response to the massive march in Paris protesting Muslim values when it comes to an individual’s freedom of expression. Erdogan said that with Mahmoud Abbas standing next to him. Erdogan was sneering at Netanyahu’s appearance in Paris at the march. “How can a man who has killed 25,000 people in Gaza with state terrorism wave his hand in Paris? How dare he go there? The West’s hypocrisy is obvious. As Muslims, we have never taken part in terrorist massacres.  Behind these are lies, hate speech and Islamophobia. Please, the administration in those countries where our mosques are attacked need to take measures.”

This is a classic, textbook specimen of the Muslim mind at work. He accuses Netanyahu of 25,000 terrorist deaths – truth is meaningless to such a man – and says Muslims have never taken part in massacres. This from the top Turk whose people are world-famous for what they did to the Armenians a century ago this year. And he attacks back with the charge that mosques are being attacked in these countries who marched the day before.

As if there was moral equivalence between some of these cases of arson and vandalism by yahoos in the West and the massacre at Charlie Hebdo and the massacre at the Hyper Cacher grocery store.

How is Israel, how is the West to cope with such people? There was Mahmoud Abbas in Paris parading with the others as if he too is opposed to Muslim terrorism, even as his official PA and Fatah media continue to praise their his people’s Jew-killers.

How are we to deal with such uncivilized, backward, intellectually primitive, violent, delusional people?

Yes, I am afraid that the West in its degenerate decrepitude has forgotten how to take pride in its civilized way of life versus life in these other societies, such as those called Islamic.

Islamic countries are uniformly inferior in the matter of individual freedom, in having an honest judiciary, doing any research and development, in hi tech industry. Did you ever wonder why major corporations have chosen to open plants in China and the Far East and not the much closer to home Arab Muslim states on the other side of the Mediterranean?

In both locales, the Far East and North Africa, labor is cheap, but the work force in the Far East is intelligent and productive and it is not just across the water from Europe in North Africa. And the answer is obvious: Arabic-speaking Muslim countries lack a workforce with enough sophistication to work with foreign investors, hi tech, and etc.

The time has come to return to an earlier age when Europeans were not the least bit ashamed about thinking their culture was better than Muslim culture. One only has to read the shameless comments about Turkey written in the 18th century by John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, the second and third American presidents, when serving as diplomats in Europe when the Ottoman Empire was alive and kicking and was a much bigger player on the world stage than Turkey is today; an empire whose Sultan sustained a harem of 1,500 women catered to by hundreds of black eunuchs kidnapped and castrated in Africa before being sold as slaves in Istanbul’s slave market.

The Turks had an empire but a landlocked one only. It was one, contiguous sprawl around the Mediterranean, rooted in Asia Minor, and the reason the Turks did not sail the globe and create foreign colonies in their empire as the Europeans did was their backward inability to master the science of navigation.

Angela Merkel was the brave one a year or so ago when she dared to say that integration in Germany had failed. The Muslims have not integrated as people thought they might, and that, of course, is the situation all over Europe. And in light of that, if Europe is to survive this invasion, it must immediately, its best thinkers, sit down and re-think the relationship.

Which should lead to creative, new legislation thinking outside the box, starting perhaps in the Torah. Every day, three times a day, we pray for those who have converted, but there are some peoples in which a convert must wait ten generations for his family line to be accepted.

The European might do something like that. They might require that citizenship be delayed ten generations, and those who commit in any of these generations a crime of violence would be immediately deported back to where they came from.

The Europeans should also give serious thought to Israel’s practice of blowing up the homes of Muslim terrorists, turning their parents and whoever is inside them into homeless refugees. One major problem with these Muslim murderers is the absence of human empathy for their victims. But, if they are capable at all of any empathy (perhaps for their mothers and fathers and brothers), they have to know that after their suicidal homicide(s), their families will suffer.

Europe, the West, has to reconsider the relationship to the Muslim world where, in addition to the horrors in Paris, in Nigeria Muslims are slaughtering Christians wholesale.

What all those 44 statesmen in Paris should now do is reconvene in Lagos, Nigeria, to march there and express solidarity with the government there confronted with these savage Muslims in league with Devil. You know, like sending 10-year-old girls strapped with dynamite on suicide missions which they have done in the last week or so.

In Pakistan Muslims as well have been known to burn Christians alive.

It is the West that must ask itself how to deal with Islam where, in Islam’s homeland in Saudi Arabia this week, an anti-government blogger was lashed twenty times in public and he can look forward to 49 more such sessions.

What is this, the 7th century? And the answer obviously is yes. In some ways, with these Muslims, yes.

With the President of the United States incapable of standing up for the West and challenging Islam to opt for civilization.

About the Author:

Sha’i ben-Tekoa’s Biography

Sha’i ben-Tekoa was born, raised and educated in the United States of America. He received a B.A. in Comparative Religion from Columbia University and did graduate work in same at the University of Chicago Divinity School.

A traveler in Arab lands, he served in Israel during the Yom Kippur War of 1973. His articles on the Arab-Israeli conflict, terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, National Review, Midstream, Congress Monthly and other publications.

He appeared on American Public Broadcasting’s The MacNeil-Lehrer NewsHour. In preparation for 1991’s historic Arab-Israeli peace conference in Madrid, he worked on assignment for the Office of the Prime Minister of Israel Yitzhak Shamir.  He was formerly lead English language commentator for IsraelNationalNews.com.

He broadcasts his Internet radio commentary and music program from the hills of Judea 3 nights a week.   These webcasts, other articles & videos can be seen or heard by signing up on his Website: www.deprogramprogram.com.

If you are a supporter of Israel, “Phantom Nation” is a must-read book. If you support the putatively Paleolithic “Palestinians,” you had better read this book. Sha’i ben-Tekoa skewers the myth of a “Palestinian” nation with rights to land the League of Nations specifically recognized as Jewish. The author, hired for a research project by the Office of Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir discovered the first mention ever in a United Nations resolution of “Palestinians” in the year 1970, three years after Israel united Jerusalem, and conquered Judea and Samaria, a.k.a. the “West Bank.” The author also shows how this very no-name of a name, “West Bank,” had to be invented to describe the hills the Arabs had never named. Hence, the sterile, topographical description lacking all historical associations, which exposes the fraud that is the “Palestinian” counter-claim to land the League of Nations said was designated as a Jewish Homeland. Before 1959, when Gamal Nasser of Egypt conjured up the idea of a phantom “Palestinian” nation, the record of Holy Land history is perfectly empty of any mention of Arab Muslim Palestinians.

After Ben-Tekoa’s government assignment ended, he went in search of the full story surrounding the birth of this allegedly archaic community, and the story he tells covers the entire sweep of Zionist and Israeli history; its wars and waves of Arab and Muslim massacres (terrorism) and the birth of this notional nation a Biblical generation of forty years after the League of Nations’ decision. He likens the rise of “Palestinian Nationalism” to Holocaust Denial as a twin perversion of history; as our generation’s successor ideology to medieval Christianity and Nazism as forms of homicidal anti-Semitism. It is our time’s way of justifying the mass murder of Jews.

“Phantom Nation” is also a crackling, riveting, great read.

##########